iPlant Collaborative

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
 

The iPlant Collaborative: what potential does it have for advancing plant science?

 

The first principle of the iPlant Collaborative – our "prime directive", one might say – is that it must be "by, for and of the community". A second major principle is that the iPC's cyberinfrastructure designs must be driven by specific, compelling, and tractable Grand Challenges in the plant sciences. A third major principle is that the Collaborative must serve the entire breadth of the plant sciences, including ecology, evolution and organismic biology as much as the molecular, cellular and developmental disciplines, and via Grand Challenges integrated across the 'divide', from the molecular to the organismic to ecosystems.  

Importantlythe project is NOT based on the idea that "if we build it, they will come.Rather, the plant biology community, together with computing researchers, must first come together and decide what grand challenge questions should drive cyberinfrastructure development. So, the first challenge we face is to engage the community to identify the most compelling and tractable Grand Challenges that require computational approaches and cyberinfrastructure development. See iPlant's community wiki and the meeting wiki (links at left) and feel free to contribute your ideas to the discussion of what these GC's ought to be.

Self-forming Grand Challenge Teams are the most direct way to participate in the iPlant Collaborative. Any group can start a Grand Challenge Team, or propose a Grand Challenge Workshop at which to develop one. GC Teams are central to the iPlant Collaborative because the community through its Board of Directors will choose which Grand Challenges should be prioritized for cyberinfrastructure design and development. Once GC Teams are chosen (our target is 2-4 GCT's before late 2008/early 2009), the iPC's Integrated Solutions Team, led by Lincoln Stein (CSHL) and Sudha Ram (UA), will work with each GCT to design a 'Discovery Environment' to address a particular grand challenge. Successful development of these prototype cyberinfrastructures (Discovery Environments) will require close interaction between IS Team and GC Team members. (See the Grand Challenge Process and the Supplemental Info for more details.) GC Team members can participate from anywhere in the world. 

To ensure community buy-in and ownership of the Collaborative, an independent Board of Directors has been selected which will set priorities for the allocation of Collaborative resources to particular grand challenges, through a process involving self-forming grand challenge teams that will arise from the community and make proposals to the Board. The PI's will be available to facilitate the efforts of GC teams, but we are agnostic about which grand challenges should be prioritized. To ensure substantial independence, the Board of Directors was appointed through a bootstrapping process, via a Nominating Committee, not by the PI's. One third of the Board will refresh annually, allowing new members of the community to serve. 

The iPC is funded by the National Science Foundation's Plant Sciences Cyberinfrastructure Collaborative (PSCIC) program in Emerging Frontiers: "The Emerging Frontiers (EF) Division is an incubator for 21st Century Biology.  EF supports multidisciplinary research opportunities and networking activities that arise from advances in disciplinary research.  By encouraging synergy between disciplines, EF provides a mechanism by which new initiatives will be fostered and subsequently integrated into core programs."

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 3

Director's Log

Cyberdate: March 10, 2008

Our responsibility is to be a transparent organization that is by, for, and of the community

Thus, we are happy to provide several background documents of interest at the tab above, Supplementary Information. We hope the community will find this information helpful and informative. Please note that the "controlling" document is the final one - early docs were part of the process, but revised at each stage in accordance with reviews, site visit and NSF policies and requests. 

1. Our PSCIC proposal,  

"The iPlant Collaborative: A Cyberinfrastructured- Centered Community for a New Plant Biology"

2. Answers to questions posed by the site visit team.

3. A powerpoint presentation based on what we presented at the site visit 

4. Additional information provided to NSF after the site visit

5. Our Cooperative Agreement with NSF (Programmatic Terms and Conditions) 

Past logs here
 
March 9, 2008

Is there anything outside the mission of the iPlant Collaborative? It seems so broad....

Data collection is one major activity that is not within our remit. If Grand Challenges require new data, Grand Challenge Teams will need to raise external funds to collect those data.  The iPC will work with GC Teams to design and build prototype cyberinfrastructures (Discovery Environments) to specifications necessary to solve Grand Challenges, but these Grand Challenges must be tractable, i.e., the necessary data must be available and of sufficient quality to be useful to solve the Grand Challenge, and the necessary computational tools must exist. Thus, we also are not funded to carry out novel, long term, computing research. No doubt, other researchers will identify new, cutting-edge research problems through the Grand Challenge Identification process and will obtain funding to develop novel computational approaches that will ultimately benefit plant biology, but the iPC is not permitted to fund such longer term research. We intend to encourage and facilitate such funding efforts, whether for new data collection or computing research. 

 

Who's Online

We have 21 guests online